« Back to Summary
Which topics were given exaggerated importance?
#Response DateResponse Text
1Jun 12, 2010 6:40 AMa little bit too much focus on results
2Jun 12, 2010 7:10 AMSignalling
3Jun 12, 2010 7:21 AM-
4Jun 12, 2010 10:58 AMRibosomes :)))
5Jun 12, 2010 12:09 PMribosome
6Jun 12, 2010 2:34 PMnone
7Jun 12, 2010 2:47 PMtoo much focus on results
8Jun 12, 2010 3:43 PMEM techniques
9Jun 12, 2010 4:46 PMMembrane proteins
10Jun 12, 2010 5:47 PMBiological background. This is, of course, essential, but it was very much compared to other things.
11Jun 12, 2010 5:58 PMspecific structural topics
12Jun 13, 2010 12:50 AMViruses, membrane signalling
13Jun 13, 2010 2:20 AMRiboso,es, but then that was the Nobel theme. :)
14Jun 13, 2010 7:24 AMelectron microscopy
15Jun 13, 2010 11:20 AMribosomes - but this is understandable given the importance of the recent prizes for the field
16Jun 13, 2010 9:21 PMEM techniques
17Jun 14, 2010 12:50 AMI would say that it may have been a little bit too much on membrane signalling.
18Jun 14, 2010 9:22 AM"old" stories, which sometimes were like history lessons
19Jun 14, 2010 5:36 PMsee above (i.e. some talks were too focused on subject-specific results)
20Jun 14, 2010 9:18 PMtoo ^much o "reults" and not enough of "methods"
21Jun 14, 2010 9:55 PMElectron microscopy
22Jun 15, 2010 9:56 AMNone
23Jun 15, 2010 10:00 AMthere was to much time invested in lectures, i.e. lectures were more about results and maybe they should have been more about methods and things young researches could realy use right after the coming home from Erice
24Jun 15, 2010 11:31 AMTo my liking, there was too much biology and too little crystallography.
25Jun 15, 2010 12:11 PMribosome
26Jun 16, 2010 6:52 AMnone
27Jun 16, 2010 11:57 PMN/A
28Jun 17, 2010 11:58 AMCryo EM
29Jun 20, 2010 6:05 PMNone
30Jun 21, 2010 6:57 AMmembrane proteins
31Jun 21, 2010 9:37 AMcryo EM